Link the last paragraph to the introduction and reiterate a key word or phrase used in the beginning. Conclude with a quotation from a primary reference, redefine a key term, or set your argument in a larger context by demonstrating how your paper falls within a larger area of concern or by posing further questions.
Nicole Newman is a Dartmouth College associate who works in Tiltfactor Laboratory, Dartmouth's premier game design center. Her research has included investigating the digital humanities through "Writing as a Dimensional Artifact" and "Evolution of the Ghetto: How to Write a Controversial Essay. How to Write an Opposing Viewpoint Essay. Accessed 14 September Depending on which text editor you're pasting into, you might have to add the italics to the site name. Warnings Proofread carefully for grammar and spelling errors.
Double-check your source information and documentation. Things Needed Pen Paper. Purdue Online Writing Lab: It will also really get people into their emotions too. Something that is out of the norm like that will also get into peoples emotions.
The other scene brought up about the secretary of defense authorizing the torture of his son to uncover evidence of a terrorist plot would take anyone by surprise and most likely feel disgusted. As a parent you should always want to protect your child… not torture them, so imagine how an audience would feel especially parents after reading about this.
It would most definitely catch their attention and get in touch with their feelings. Logos has to do with logic, reasoning, argumentation. Using facts, figures, and case studies to prove the point. She bases a lot of her article off of this idea.
This is just proving the point that watching TV does not make you any smarter, and not watching TV does not make you any dumber. Steven Johnson uses logos when he starts stating facts about TV shows and lets the audience know full details about it. Johnson goes on to talk about Television shows, when doing so he gives the audience a lot of facts about them to show they are legitimate. Johnson always states the exact full detail about every show he uses to prove his argument correct.
When Johnson does so he gives the audience a sense that he knows what he is talking about. He always backs up his argument with facts… this can let the audience know he has done his research, he has gone through the trouble to figure out everything there is know about the show including small things like the airing time, etc.
In conclusion, both writers use a lot of ethos, pathos, and logos to prove their argument. At some points one author may have used them better to prove their argument. Steven Johnson had a very strong ethos, pretty good pathos and also an average logos. Dana Stevens just used an overall strong use of all three ethos, pathos, and logos to prove her argument that TV does not make you smarter. She gave facts, appealed to the audiences emotions, gave the audience a sense of credibility and trustworthiness.
Both writers are very talented and experienced but Dana Stevens won the audience over with all these techniques backing up her argument.
Both Craig and Kim use logos as their strongest persuasion device. Craig captures readers by presenting hard facts with percents and numbers. He states that the vegetarian life-style is consistently associated with lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels along with less obesity and heart disease. Craig also refers to studies that prove vegetarians have one-half the risk of cancer and have a percent lower risk of overall mortality.
This information triples as a logos, pathos, and ethos appeal. Another devise they both use to strengthen their stance is pathos. The authors use this device to attract the readers emotions. Kim brings up the cruel treatment of animals raised for food. It is understandable that he was trying to get the readers emotions going here, but honestly it is quite off topic.
His point was to inform his audience how vegetarianism is actually not the healthiest choice. He brings up another point that the long term affects are what you have to watch out for. The topic of cancer always pulls on heart strings. Just about everyone knows someone that has been affected by cancer.
Both authors mention some information that they know will get an emotion response out of their audience. While both authors discuss the same topic, their valid viewpoints differ. In the end, Craig more successfully convinced his readers to take his side on this issue.
- Three Opposing Viewpoints on Abortion Abortion has been an issue of heated debate in the United States for numerous years. Legislation has ruled it legal to perform an abortion on any gestational age .
Opposing Viewpoints essays"The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind.
Opposing Viewpoints Essay Madison Martin CORE 10/14/14 Opposing Viewpoints Essay Everyone has their own opinion The person sitting next to you can have an entirely different outlook . An opposing viewpoint essay calls for a student to investigate a topic and evaluate the evidence supporting one side of an argument. This type of essay calls for extensive research of literature and, at times, empirical research through surveys and interviews.
Mar 15, · subject from the Opposing Viewpoints in Context from the university library. Make sure you obtain articles that cover both sides or points of view on the subject (one should be for it and the . When it comes to viewpoints there will always be an opposing side. You must develop your strongly focused opinion with examples and/or reasons. In order for a reader to accept your side you must use clear, powerful, and direct language to really capture them.